before the gavel falls. The quiet musings of a humble country lawyer in the big city.

About Me

My Photo
Name: MrSpkr
Location: Midlothian, Texas, United States

View my complete profile




The A-List
  • Wizbang!
  • Zombietime
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Hillbilly White Trash
  • Dinocrat
  • Instapundit
  • Confederate Yankee
  • NROnline
  • Polipundit
  • Best of the Web
  • RedState
  • Stop the ACLU!
  • Power Line Blog
  • Little Green Footballs


  • Legal Bloggers
  • Volokh Conspiracy
  • Ann Althouse
  • Say What? Classic Legal Humor
  • Southern Appeal
  • Ernie the Attorney


  • Friends and Neighbors
  • Katey's Kafe
  • Emporer Misha
  • Mover Mike
  • Texas Rainmaker
  • So A Blonde Walks Into A Blog


  • Conservative Bloggers
  • Moxie!
  • The Digital Brownshirt
  • Little Miss Attila
  • Clayton Cramer's Blog
  • Rhymes With Right
  • Just Some Poor Schmuck
  • SarahK
  • The Anchoress
  • Slapstick Politics
  • Darleen's Place
  • The Devil's Kitchen
  • Redneck Texan
  • Moonbattery
  • Wizbang Politics
  • Random Numbers


  • The Right Wingers
  • Right Wing News
  • Right Wing Sparkle
  • Right Wing, Nut!
  • Right Wing Nuthouse


  • The War on Islamic Fascism
  • The Counterterrorism Blog
  • Daniel Pipes
  • The Gates of Vienna
  • Jihad Watch
  • TigerHawk
  • Victor Davis Hanson
  • Pedestrian Infidel


  • Political Satire
  • WuzzaDem
  • The Political Therapist
  • Iowahawk
  • FrankJ
  • The Nose On Your Face
  • The People's Cube
  • Conservative Cat
  • Scooter's Report

  • Support Our Troops!
  • The Mudville Gazette
  • Blackfive
  • Pentagon News


  • Other Good Reads
  • Geeks To Go!
  • The Daily Bleat
  • GamerDad
  • Boingboing
  • Want sugar?
  • A Girl and Her Blog
  • The Hatemonger's Quarterly
  • Hot Air
  • The Scratching Post


  • Broadcast Links
  • WBAP, Dallas
  • G. Gordon Liddy
  • The BBC
  • The Pentagon Channel




  • Archives
    July 2002
    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    April 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    November 2008
    January 2009
    February 2009
    April 2009
    November 2011
    MrSpkr's random thoughts . . .
    Thursday, February 09, 2006
     
    I do not think those words mean what you think they mean.
    The Wright Amendment, an odious remnant of the era before airline deregulation, has been under considerable fire for some time now (see previous blog entry here).

    Now, Senators Cornyn and Hutchinson are asking DFW and Love field to
    Figure out a solution that is acceptable to the region, or Congress might overturn the Wright amendment in a fashion that could be distasteful to almost everyone.
    Huh? "Distasteful to almost everyone?"

    Maybe -- if by the term "everyone", you mean "Everyone except members of the flying public who currently pay far more to fly out of the DFW area than any other comparable metropolitan area in the country."

    What is the worst that could happen?" Last year, Congress expanded the Wright Amendment's reach to include Missouri. The result? Passengers flying from DFW to Missouri airports in Kansas City and St. Louis saved hundreds of dollars.

    In fact the disparity between American Airlines' inflated rates out of DFW and Southwest's lower fares is such that the addition of Missouri to the list of "approved" states under the Wright Amendment is such that many travelers between Omaha, Nebraska and DFW find it much cheaper to drive an extra 180 miles from Omaha's Eppley field to Kansas City's airport and hop on a Southwest flight to Love field.

    Why would anyone do this? Simple:
    Airfare for a nonstop round trip to Dallas from Kansas City is running about one-fourth or less of the cost of flying nonstop from Omaha to Dallas. In one example, the difference was more than $450. The disparity is greater for some trips, such as those returning the same day as departing.
    Some examples:
    The first scenario: An overnight trip reserved seven days ahead, with travel any time in the morning and evening. The best Internet fare was $128 from K.C. and $584 from Omaha.

    Scenario 2: Overnight, reserved seven days in advance, with both the departure and the return flight booked during rush hours. The best fare was $156 from K.C. and nearly $1,200 from Omaha. A World-Herald check found a fare of $644 from Omaha.

    Scenario 3: Booking one-day in advance with departure and return on the same day, the best fares were $184 from K.C. and $704 from Omaha.
    Okay, so flying out of KC makes more sense economically. It can also hurt Eppley's business.
    Don Smithey, executive director of the Omaha Airport Authority, said that over a year, the difference could add up to at least $18 million more in air fare to fly from Omaha, if the same number of passengers continued to fly from Omaha to Dallas on American.
    And why is there such a disparity?
    American Airlines spokesman Tim Smith said the low fares are due to competition.

    "This is perhaps no solace," he said, "but there is perhaps no other market in the country right now that is going through the extreme competition of the DFW-to-Kansas City market."

    Stan Kathol, finance and administration director of the Omaha Airport Authority, said American's Omaha fares display a lack of competition.

    "When they lack competition, they charge whatever the market will bear," he said.
    Tim and Stan are both right. Competition benefits the consumer. Kansas City passengers are enjoying the benefits of competition. American Airlines wants to make sure that those benefits are not expanded to any other markets, because, absent competition, American Airlines and DFW can fatten themselves on the pocketbooks of passengers who have no alternatives available.

    Of course, given that the lowered fares in KC Given has probably taken business away from Eppley, Nebraska congressmen are now seeking another expansion of the Wright Amendment. ""The repeal of the Wright Amendment could provide better fares and air travel opportunities for Nebraskans," [Rep. Lee Terry, R-NE, said]. "Recent analysis shows this antiquated law is hindering economic competition and not providing Nebraskans with the best travel options.

    And once Nebraska has it's exemption, South Dakota will certainly want one, too. After all, Sioux City is about as far from Omaha as Omaha is from Kansas City.

    The real answer, of course, is to give the public what they want, and what worked so well in the past: deregulation. The Wright Amendment needs to go away.

    Some say that eliminating the Wright Amendment would kill DFW International Airport and/or American Airlines. Nonsense. What it would do is force DFW and American to engage and compete in the marketplace, just like every other company and organization. I am supremely confident that both American and DFW will not only survive Wright's demise, but thrive.
    - posted by MrSpkr @ 11:04
    Comments:
    Hear Hear!!

    I didn't realize you were so close to me. I'm in Las Colinas (Irving).

    I used to work for American back in the days of Crandall the idiot. We constantly heard about the supportive culture at Southwest. They were actually nice to their employees.
    # posted by Blogger Christi Nielsen : Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:25:00 PM
     
    The opening line to this blog is very interesting. Just the same kind of wording hit me in 1997 when I was doing my dissertation.

    Lord Woolf: "Litigation will be avoided whenever possible" in a report entitled "Access to Justice". Ironic if you don't litigate you don't access justice.

    What he meant was the "opposite" - "Access FROM Justice".

    It wasn't a "reduction in litigation", it was an "avoidance of justice".

    My blogspot should be interesting reading for you concerning high profile judicial corruption in the UK and an academic cover up which may potentially impact in Europe - 24 out of 25 Member States are processing the Directive on Mediation - Denmark have abstained (probably because they are more intelligent than others or may be they got my research earlier!). The Directive contains the same fundamental flaw as the Woolf Report.

    Anticipating you are interested in some Jurisprudence and politics.

    Regards.

    Lesley
    # posted by Blogger Lesley McDade : Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:45:00 AM
     
    I love your blog. This is a cool site and I wanted to post a little note to tell you, good job! Best wishes!!!
    what is mediation omaha
    # posted by Blogger Unknown : Monday, February 24, 2014 2:23:00 PM
     
    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger





    © 2005 MrSpkr LLC. All rights reserved.