before the gavel falls. The quiet musings of a humble country lawyer in the big city.
The A-List
Legal Bloggers
Friends and Neighbors
Conservative Bloggers
The Right Wingers
The War on Islamic Fascism
Political Satire
Support Our Troops!
Other Good Reads
Broadcast Links
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
April 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
November 2008
January 2009
February 2009
April 2009
November 2011
Sunday, December 11, 2005
If the cause of the fire is unknown . . .
why does Sky News state that terrorists aren't involved?
The cause of the explosions is not yet known but no third party - a plane or a terrorist - was involved.That seems like a pretty quick conclusion on somebody's part.
Honestly, I don't know if terrorists are involved. I rather suspect they are not.
But it does seem a bit premature to conclusively state they are not involved, doesn't it?
- posted by MrSpkr @ 16:16
Comments:
<< Home
It's amazing how quickly terrorism is declared not part of any explosion, even while admitting they haven't a clue as to what caused it.
Post a Comment
<< Home
