before the gavel falls. The quiet musings of a humble country lawyer in the big city.

About Me

My Photo
Name: MrSpkr
Location: Midlothian, Texas, United States

View my complete profile




The A-List
  • Wizbang!
  • Zombietime
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Hillbilly White Trash
  • Dinocrat
  • Instapundit
  • Confederate Yankee
  • NROnline
  • Polipundit
  • Best of the Web
  • RedState
  • Stop the ACLU!
  • Power Line Blog
  • Little Green Footballs


  • Legal Bloggers
  • Volokh Conspiracy
  • Ann Althouse
  • Say What? Classic Legal Humor
  • Southern Appeal
  • Ernie the Attorney


  • Friends and Neighbors
  • Katey's Kafe
  • Emporer Misha
  • Mover Mike
  • Texas Rainmaker
  • So A Blonde Walks Into A Blog


  • Conservative Bloggers
  • Moxie!
  • The Digital Brownshirt
  • Little Miss Attila
  • Clayton Cramer's Blog
  • Rhymes With Right
  • Just Some Poor Schmuck
  • SarahK
  • The Anchoress
  • Slapstick Politics
  • Darleen's Place
  • The Devil's Kitchen
  • Redneck Texan
  • Moonbattery
  • Wizbang Politics
  • Random Numbers


  • The Right Wingers
  • Right Wing News
  • Right Wing Sparkle
  • Right Wing, Nut!
  • Right Wing Nuthouse


  • The War on Islamic Fascism
  • The Counterterrorism Blog
  • Daniel Pipes
  • The Gates of Vienna
  • Jihad Watch
  • TigerHawk
  • Victor Davis Hanson
  • Pedestrian Infidel


  • Political Satire
  • WuzzaDem
  • The Political Therapist
  • Iowahawk
  • FrankJ
  • The Nose On Your Face
  • The People's Cube
  • Conservative Cat
  • Scooter's Report

  • Support Our Troops!
  • The Mudville Gazette
  • Blackfive
  • Pentagon News


  • Other Good Reads
  • Geeks To Go!
  • The Daily Bleat
  • GamerDad
  • Boingboing
  • Want sugar?
  • A Girl and Her Blog
  • The Hatemonger's Quarterly
  • Hot Air
  • The Scratching Post


  • Broadcast Links
  • WBAP, Dallas
  • G. Gordon Liddy
  • The BBC
  • The Pentagon Channel




  • Archives
    July 2002
    February 2003
    March 2003
    April 2003
    September 2003
    October 2003
    November 2003
    December 2003
    January 2004
    February 2004
    March 2004
    April 2004
    June 2004
    July 2004
    August 2004
    September 2004
    October 2004
    November 2004
    December 2004
    January 2005
    February 2005
    March 2005
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    April 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    November 2008
    January 2009
    February 2009
    April 2009
    November 2011
    MrSpkr's random thoughts . . .
    Friday, February 04, 2005
     
    The reasonable person standard flies out the window
    In tort law, one of the foundations for recovery is what is called the "reasonable man" standard. This is the standard against which a Defendant's conduct will be measured to determine whether he will be held liable for damages. It holds that a Defendant will be liable for damages caused by his or her negligent acts if a reasonable man in similar circumstances would or should know of the potential for the sort of harm caused to the Plaintiff. For example, if P is driving down a neighborhood street at a high rate of speed and D backs out of a driveway and is hit, P can be held liable because a reasonable person in D's circumstances (i.e., driving too fast in a neighborhood) should have known that the type of damages he caused the Plaintiff was a foreseeable result of D's negligence (driving too fast for the circumstances).

    This case, however, has turned the "reasonable person" standard on it's head. How is it foreseeable that simply knocking on someone's door at night might cause them so much anxiety that they would check themselves into the hospital the next day? How is delivering cookies to someone evidence of reckless disregard for the well being of another?

    Sorry, but the Plaintiff here appears to be a nutjob, and this kind of case is evidence of how out of control our litigious society has become.

    Sigh.
    - posted by MrSpkr @ 11:20
    Comments:
    Well ... yeah ... but ...

    10:30 is awfully late to be knocking on doors in any neighborhood and if you have a little old lady who worries about such things I can see why she'd get upset. You or I might not but then YOU'D have your Glock 9mm (you being a Rebpublican) and I'd have my ACLU card (me being a Democrat) for protection.

    Also the judgement was, as I recall, limited to the $900 bill from the E.R.

    Your point is correct, of course, we are far too litigious ... we should kill all the lawyers ... oh wait ...

    Joe
    # posted by Blogger Joe Shaw : Friday, February 04, 2005 3:21:00 PM
     
    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger





    © 2005 MrSpkr LLC. All rights reserved.