MrSpkr's random thoughts . . .

before the gavel falls. The quiet musings of a humble country lawyer in the big city.

Wednesday, December 17, 2003

Barry has a beautiful description of the way the Left changes the arguments about the War on Terrorism:

Anti: Why haven't you proven your case for invasion to my standards?

Pro: We proved it to our satisfaction using the best available evidence.

Anti: I don't see it that way. Why aren't you invading other countries using that same criteria.

Pro: Well other options are still open.

Anti: Hypocrite Imperialist why haven't you invaded Syria?

Pro: OK lets move towards action in Syria.

Anti: Militarist! Where's your evidence to support your war-mongering.

Pro: Well there's the intelligence regarding truckloads of something going from Iraq to Syria. Many terrorist organizations have headquarters in Damascus and Syria is well known to fund these organizations.

Anti: Fraud! Liar! Why are you picking on Syria? Isn't North Korea, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia just as bad?

Pro: Would you support action against any of those countries?

Anti: Blood for Oil! Why do you never consider diplomacy for conflict resolution?

Pro: Well months of negotiations have proven fruitless and France is being contrary.

Anti: Unilateralist! Your cowboy bumbling is wrecking the world.

Pro: Can we get back to terrorism?

Anti: Bumbler! Why haven't you accomplished anything?

Etc..etc...etc...etc...

Perfect. Just, perfect.

Steve
- posted by MrSpkr @ 13:20

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

About Me